Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/3] x86/nmi: Print all cpu stacks from NMI safely

[Steven Rostedt]

On Fri, 20 Jun 2014 01:27:26 +0200 (CEST)
Jiri Kosina <jkosina@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> 
> I don't think there is a need for a global stop_machine()-like 
> synchronization here. The printing CPU will be sending IPI to the CPU N+1 
> only after it has finished printing CPU N stacktrace.

So you plan on sending an IPI to a CPU then wait for it to acknowledge
that it is spinning, and then print out the data and then tell the CPU
it can stop spinning?

-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/