Re: [bisected] pre-3.16 regression on open() scalability
From: Paul E. McKenney
Date: Fri Jun 20 2014 - 11:38:49 EST
On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 10:20:36AM -0500, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Jun 2014, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>
> > I am putting together patches based on Eric Dumazet's suggestion and on a
> > variant of the above approach. However, I do expect the distros to starve
> > to death between those two bales of hay. But perhaps the actual patches
> > will inspire a bit of light to go with this thread's heat and smoke.
>
> Yep. Note that the large systems are only a few and the smaller systems
> are many. You are penalizing the overwhelming majority for support of a
> few systems.
And the fraction of the small systems that care that much about latency
is also quite small.
Of course, if you have performance results that show otherwise, please
share them.
Thanx, Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/