[RFC][PATCH 3/3] x86: make MP a required-feature on 64-bit
From: Dave Hansen
Date: Fri Jun 20 2014 - 12:17:50 EST
Today, we assume that all 64-bit cpus have X86_FEATURE_MP. It
should be in the REQUIRED_MASK so that we do not need the #undef
trick for it.
---
b/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h | 3 ---
b/arch/x86/include/asm/required-features.h | 4 +++-
2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff -puN arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h~x86-make-mp-required_feature arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h~x86-make-mp-required_feature 2014-06-20 09:16:10.180396969 -0700
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h 2014-06-20 09:16:10.185397194 -0700
@@ -362,9 +362,6 @@ extern const char * const x86_power_flag
#undef cpu_has_pae
#define cpu_has_pae ___BUG___
-#undef cpu_has_mp
-#define cpu_has_mp 1
-
#endif /* CONFIG_X86_64 */
#if __GNUC__ >= 4
diff -puN arch/x86/include/asm/required-features.h~x86-make-mp-required_feature arch/x86/include/asm/required-features.h
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/required-features.h~x86-make-mp-required_feature 2014-06-20 09:16:10.182397059 -0700
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/required-features.h 2014-06-20 09:16:10.186397240 -0700
@@ -67,6 +67,7 @@
#define NEED_XMM (1<<(X86_FEATURE_XMM & 31))
#define NEED_XMM2 (1<<(X86_FEATURE_XMM2 & 31))
#define NEED_LM (1<<(X86_FEATURE_LM & 31))
+#define NEED_MP (1<<(X86_FEATURE_MP & 31))
#else
#define NEED_PSE 0
#define NEED_MSR 0
@@ -75,6 +76,7 @@
#define NEED_XMM 0
#define NEED_XMM2 0
#define NEED_LM 0
+#define NEED_MP 0
#endif
#define REQUIRED_MASK0 (NEED_FPU|NEED_PSE|NEED_MSR|NEED_PAE|\
@@ -82,7 +84,7 @@
NEED_XMM|NEED_XMM2)
#define SSE_MASK (NEED_XMM|NEED_XMM2)
-#define REQUIRED_MASK1 (NEED_LM|NEED_3DNOW)
+#define REQUIRED_MASK1 (NEED_LM|NEED_3DNOW|NEED_MP)
#define REQUIRED_MASK2 0
#define REQUIRED_MASK3 (NEED_NOPL)
_
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/