Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/3] trace_seq: Move the trace_seq code to lib/
From: Steven Rostedt
Date: Fri Jun 20 2014 - 12:21:42 EST
On Thu, 19 Jun 2014 18:45:57 -1000
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 11:33 AM, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > From: "Steven Rostedt (Red Hat)" <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > The trace_seq functions are rather useful outside of tracing.
>
> They are?
They will be.
> Why and where?
Why? for NMI safe output.
Where? Well, in patch 3. :-)
> And why are they still called "trace_xyz()" then?
Good point, I'd like to rename it too. It was designed like seq_file,
so what about seq_buffer_xxx()?
>
> That commit message is useless and contains no actual information.
Yeah, it was rather weak. It was quick and not a stand alone. It was
dependent on reading the rest of the patches.
OK, I can update the name and make a better change log on the move.
Of course if you hate this patch series, I can just not waste any time
on it.
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/