Re: [ 059/143] sysctl net: Keep tcp_syn_retries inside the boundary

[Eric W. Biederman]

Willy Tarreau <w@xxxxxx> writes:

> Hi Luis,
>
> On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 01:55:53PM +0100, Luis Henriques wrote:
>> I was finally able to spend some more time with this and tried (a
>> modified) Tyler's patch on top of 2.6.32.62, and it seems to work.
>> Although I haven't done any extended testing, I don't see the two
>> stack traces and the /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ directory seems to be
>> correctly populated.
>> 
>> I'm attaching the patch I've used, based on Tyler's.
>
> Would any of you or Tyler please kindly pass me a signed-off-by with
> a commit message ? That would be great. Alternately I'd do it myself
> and mention you authored them.

If my memory serves it is possibe in 2.6.32 to set 
.ctl_name = CTL_UNNEEDED

and not need to implement a .strategy routine at all.

Given the fact that most people got the strategy routines
slightly wrong and that sys_sysctl is effectively unused
a strategy where you don't implement code that no-one
will use in a backport I would be preferable.

Since you have mentioned this has come up a couple of times if something
else this will be something to think about for next time.

I am puzzled why .ctl_name was populated in a backport at all.

Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/