Re: [PATCH 2/3] sched/rt: __disable_runtime: Enqueue just unthrottled rt_rq back on the stack

[Peter Zijlstra]

On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 05:24:16PM +0400, Kirill Tkhai wrote:
> 
> Make rt_rq available for pick_next_task(). Otherwise, their tasks
> stay prisoned long time till dead cpu becomes alive again.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> CC: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> CC: Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@xxxxxxxxx>
> CC: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  kernel/sched/rt.c |    3 +++
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/rt.c b/kernel/sched/rt.c
> index a490831..671a8b5 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/rt.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/rt.c
> @@ -740,6 +740,9 @@ balanced:

Depending on what you use to generate patches, can you:

QUILT_DIFF_OPTS="-F ^[[:alpha:]\$_].*[^:]\$"

or .gitconfig:

[diff "default"]
        xfuncname = "^[[:alpha:]$_].*[^:]$"

That avoids mistaking labels (like the above balanced:) for function
names.

The patch itself makes sense though.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/