Re: [PATCH v2] platform_get_irq: Revert to platform_get_resource if of_irq_get fails

From: Rob Herring
Date: Mon Jun 23 2014 - 11:48:59 EST


On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 5:51 PM, Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Commits 9ec36ca (of/irq: do irq resolution in platform_get_irq)
> and ad69674 (of/irq: do irq resolution in platform_get_irq_byname)
> change the semantics of platform_get_irq and platform_get_irq_byname
> to always rely on devicetree information if devicetree is enabled
> and if a devicetree node is attached to the device. The functions
> now return an error if the devicetree data does not include interrupt
> information, even if the information is available as platform resource
> data.
>
> This causes mfd client drivers to fail if the interrupt number is
> passed via platform resources. Therefore, if of_irq_get fails, try
> platform_get_resource as method of last resort. This restores the
> original functionality for drivers depending on platform resources
> to get irq information.
>
> Cc: Russell King <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@xxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx>

Greg should take this for 3.16.

Rob

> ---
> v2: Include change for platform_get_irq_byname
> Handle EPROBE_DEFER
>
> It looks like v1 got lost in space, so you may not have seen it.
> I am sending this patch as v2 anyway to avoid confusion, just in case
> v1 shows up somewhere.
>
> At least 9ec36ca has been applied to -stable, so if this patch is
> accepted it may make sense to apply it to the same -stable releases.
>
> drivers/base/platform.c | 18 ++++++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/base/platform.c b/drivers/base/platform.c
> index 9e9227e..eee48c4 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/platform.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/platform.c
> @@ -89,8 +89,13 @@ int platform_get_irq(struct platform_device *dev, unsigned int num)
> return dev->archdata.irqs[num];
> #else
> struct resource *r;
> - if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF_IRQ) && dev->dev.of_node)
> - return of_irq_get(dev->dev.of_node, num);
> + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF_IRQ) && dev->dev.of_node) {
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = of_irq_get(dev->dev.of_node, num);
> + if (ret >= 0 || ret == -EPROBE_DEFER)
> + return ret;
> + }
>
> r = platform_get_resource(dev, IORESOURCE_IRQ, num);
>
> @@ -133,8 +138,13 @@ int platform_get_irq_byname(struct platform_device *dev, const char *name)
> {
> struct resource *r;
>
> - if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF_IRQ) && dev->dev.of_node)
> - return of_irq_get_byname(dev->dev.of_node, name);
> + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF_IRQ) && dev->dev.of_node) {
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = of_irq_get_byname(dev->dev.of_node, name);
> + if (ret >= 0 || ret == -EPROBE_DEFER)
> + return ret;
> + }
>
> r = platform_get_resource_byname(dev, IORESOURCE_IRQ, name);
> return r ? r->start : -ENXIO;
> --
> 1.9.1
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/