[PATCH 3.10 06/52] net: Move the permission check in sock_diag_put_filterinfo to packet_diag_dump

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

3.10-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

[ Upstream commit a53b72c83a4216f2eb883ed45a0cbce014b8e62d ]

The permission check in sock_diag_put_filterinfo is wrong, and it is so removed
from it's sources it is not clear why it is wrong.  Move the computation
into packet_diag_dump and pass a bool of the result into sock_diag_filterinfo.

This does not yet correct the capability check but instead simply moves it to make
it clear what is going on.

Reported-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 include/linux/sock_diag.h |    2 +-
 net/core/sock_diag.c      |    4 ++--
 net/packet/diag.c         |    7 ++++++-
 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

--- a/include/linux/sock_diag.h
+++ b/include/linux/sock_diag.h
@@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ int sock_diag_check_cookie(void *sk, __u
 void sock_diag_save_cookie(void *sk, __u32 *cookie);
 
 int sock_diag_put_meminfo(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb, int attr);
-int sock_diag_put_filterinfo(struct sock *sk,
+int sock_diag_put_filterinfo(bool may_report_filterinfo, struct sock *sk,
 			     struct sk_buff *skb, int attrtype);
 
 #endif
--- a/net/core/sock_diag.c
+++ b/net/core/sock_diag.c
@@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ int sock_diag_put_meminfo(struct sock *s
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(sock_diag_put_meminfo);
 
-int sock_diag_put_filterinfo(struct sock *sk,
+int sock_diag_put_filterinfo(bool may_report_filterinfo, struct sock *sk,
 			     struct sk_buff *skb, int attrtype)
 {
 	struct nlattr *attr;
@@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ int sock_diag_put_filterinfo(struct sock
 	unsigned int len;
 	int err = 0;
 
-	if (!ns_capable(sock_net(sk)->user_ns, CAP_NET_ADMIN)) {
+	if (!may_report_filterinfo) {
 		nla_reserve(skb, attrtype, 0);
 		return 0;
 	}
--- a/net/packet/diag.c
+++ b/net/packet/diag.c
@@ -127,6 +127,7 @@ static int pdiag_put_fanout(struct packe
 
 static int sk_diag_fill(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb,
 			struct packet_diag_req *req,
+			bool may_report_filterinfo,
 			struct user_namespace *user_ns,
 			u32 portid, u32 seq, u32 flags, int sk_ino)
 {
@@ -171,7 +172,8 @@ static int sk_diag_fill(struct sock *sk,
 		goto out_nlmsg_trim;
 
 	if ((req->pdiag_show & PACKET_SHOW_FILTER) &&
-	    sock_diag_put_filterinfo(sk, skb, PACKET_DIAG_FILTER))
+	    sock_diag_put_filterinfo(may_report_filterinfo, sk, skb,
+				     PACKET_DIAG_FILTER))
 		goto out_nlmsg_trim;
 
 	return nlmsg_end(skb, nlh);
@@ -187,9 +189,11 @@ static int packet_diag_dump(struct sk_bu
 	struct packet_diag_req *req;
 	struct net *net;
 	struct sock *sk;
+	bool may_report_filterinfo;
 
 	net = sock_net(skb->sk);
 	req = nlmsg_data(cb->nlh);
+	may_report_filterinfo = ns_capable(net->user_ns, CAP_NET_ADMIN);
 
 	mutex_lock(&net->packet.sklist_lock);
 	sk_for_each(sk, &net->packet.sklist) {
@@ -199,6 +203,7 @@ static int packet_diag_dump(struct sk_bu
 			goto next;
 
 		if (sk_diag_fill(sk, skb, req,
+				 may_report_filterinfo,
 				 sk_user_ns(NETLINK_CB(cb->skb).sk),
 				 NETLINK_CB(cb->skb).portid,
 				 cb->nlh->nlmsg_seq, NLM_F_MULTI,


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/