[PATCH 3.8 62/65] futex: Always cleanup owner tid in unlock_pi

From: Kamal Mostafa
Date: Tue Jun 24 2014 - 16:30:56 EST


3.8.13.25 -stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

commit 13fbca4c6ecd96ec1a1cfa2e4f2ce191fe928a5e upstream.

If the owner died bit is set at futex_unlock_pi, we currently do not
cleanup the user space futex. So the owner TID of the current owner
(the unlocker) persists. That's observable inconsistant state,
especially when the ownership of the pi state got transferred.

Clean it up unconditionally.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Will Drewry <wad@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Darren Hart <dvhart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Kamal Mostafa <kamal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
kernel/futex.c | 40 ++++++++++++++++++----------------------
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/futex.c b/kernel/futex.c
index 10e53ad..5f5a635 100644
--- a/kernel/futex.c
+++ b/kernel/futex.c
@@ -899,6 +899,7 @@ static int wake_futex_pi(u32 __user *uaddr, u32 uval, struct futex_q *this)
struct task_struct *new_owner;
struct futex_pi_state *pi_state = this->pi_state;
u32 uninitialized_var(curval), newval;
+ int ret = 0;

if (!pi_state)
return -EINVAL;
@@ -922,23 +923,19 @@ static int wake_futex_pi(u32 __user *uaddr, u32 uval, struct futex_q *this)
new_owner = this->task;

/*
- * We pass it to the next owner. (The WAITERS bit is always
- * kept enabled while there is PI state around. We must also
- * preserve the owner died bit.)
+ * We pass it to the next owner. The WAITERS bit is always
+ * kept enabled while there is PI state around. We cleanup the
+ * owner died bit, because we are the owner.
*/
- if (!(uval & FUTEX_OWNER_DIED)) {
- int ret = 0;
-
- newval = FUTEX_WAITERS | task_pid_vnr(new_owner);
+ newval = FUTEX_WAITERS | task_pid_vnr(new_owner);

- if (cmpxchg_futex_value_locked(&curval, uaddr, uval, newval))
- ret = -EFAULT;
- else if (curval != uval)
- ret = -EINVAL;
- if (ret) {
- raw_spin_unlock(&pi_state->pi_mutex.wait_lock);
- return ret;
- }
+ if (cmpxchg_futex_value_locked(&curval, uaddr, uval, newval))
+ ret = -EFAULT;
+ else if (curval != uval)
+ ret = -EINVAL;
+ if (ret) {
+ raw_spin_unlock(&pi_state->pi_mutex.wait_lock);
+ return ret;
}

raw_spin_lock_irq(&pi_state->owner->pi_lock);
@@ -2183,9 +2180,10 @@ retry:
/*
* To avoid races, try to do the TID -> 0 atomic transition
* again. If it succeeds then we can return without waking
- * anyone else up:
+ * anyone else up. We only try this if neither the waiters nor
+ * the owner died bit are set.
*/
- if (!(uval & FUTEX_OWNER_DIED) &&
+ if (!(uval & ~FUTEX_TID_MASK) &&
cmpxchg_futex_value_locked(&uval, uaddr, vpid, 0))
goto pi_faulted;
/*
@@ -2217,11 +2215,9 @@ retry:
/*
* No waiters - kernel unlocks the futex:
*/
- if (!(uval & FUTEX_OWNER_DIED)) {
- ret = unlock_futex_pi(uaddr, uval);
- if (ret == -EFAULT)
- goto pi_faulted;
- }
+ ret = unlock_futex_pi(uaddr, uval);
+ if (ret == -EFAULT)
+ goto pi_faulted;

out_unlock:
spin_unlock(&hb->lock);
--
1.9.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/