Re: [PATCH v8 1/1] man-pages: seccomp.2: document syscall

[Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)]

On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 5:10 PM, Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 6:04 AM, One Thousand Gnomes
> <gnomes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Tue, 24 Jun 2014 13:56:15 -0700
>> Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>> Combines documentation from prctl, in-kernel seccomp_filter.txt and
>>> dropper.c, along with details specific to the new syscall.
>>
>> What is the license on the example ? Probably you want to propogate the
>> minimal form of the text in seccomp/dropper into the document example to
>> avoid confusion ?
>
> What is the license of the other code examples in man-pages?

Typically, just the same as the rest if the page text. Perhaps that
should be rethought for future examples. I haven't thought about it at
length, but, at first glance, I'm not against having separate licenses
for the page text and the code sample.

Cheers,

Michael

-- 
Michael Kerrisk
Linux man-pages maintainer; http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/
Linux/UNIX System Programming Training: http://man7.org/training/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/