Re: [PATCH] clk: define and export __clk_get_debug for providers

From: Tomeu Vizoso
Date: Thu Jun 26 2014 - 03:38:09 EST


On 25 June 2014 20:23, Mike Turquette <mturquette@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Peter,
>
> Just FYI, I'm trying to reverse the trend of prepending double
> underscores for functions that are used by clock providers. That stuff
> started out small and sort of grew out of control ;-)

I'm looking at rebasing Rabin's patches for per-user clks, and I have
had to add a few variants for providers, so they can be called with
clk_core instead. Have been prepending underscores for those internal
variants, but in some cases I had to also append a _internal suffix
because there were already variants without locking.

What convention were you thinking of for distinguishing provider-only
variants for e.g. clk_set_rate?

Regards,

Tomeu
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/