[PATCH 3.12 044/181] xfs: don't perform discard if the given range length is less than block size

[Jiri Slaby]

From: Jie Liu <jeff.liu@xxxxxxxxxx>

3.12-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

===============

commit f9fd0135610084abef6867d984e9951c3099950d upstream.

For discard operation, we should return EINVAL if the given range length
is less than a block size, otherwise it will go through the file system
to discard data blocks as the end range might be evaluated to -1, e.g,
/xfs7: 9811378176 bytes were trimmed

This issue can be triggered via xfstests/generic/288.

Also, it seems to get the request queue pointer via bdev_get_queue()
instead of the hard code pointer dereference is not a bad thing.

Signed-off-by: Jie Liu <jeff.liu@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Ben Myers <bpm@xxxxxxx>

Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@xxxxxxx>
---
 fs/xfs/xfs_discard.c | 5 +++--
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_discard.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_discard.c
index 45560ee1a4ba..19d9fd6caf8c 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_discard.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_discard.c
@@ -158,7 +158,7 @@ xfs_ioc_trim(
 	struct xfs_mount		*mp,
 	struct fstrim_range __user	*urange)
 {
-	struct request_queue	*q = mp->m_ddev_targp->bt_bdev->bd_disk->queue;
+	struct request_queue	*q = bdev_get_queue(mp->m_ddev_targp->bt_bdev);
 	unsigned int		granularity = q->limits.discard_granularity;
 	struct fstrim_range	range;
 	xfs_daddr_t		start, end, minlen;
@@ -181,7 +181,8 @@ xfs_ioc_trim(
 	 * matter as trimming blocks is an advisory interface.
 	 */
 	if (range.start >= XFS_FSB_TO_B(mp, mp->m_sb.sb_dblocks) ||
-	    range.minlen > XFS_FSB_TO_B(mp, XFS_ALLOC_AG_MAX_USABLE(mp)))
+	    range.minlen > XFS_FSB_TO_B(mp, XFS_ALLOC_AG_MAX_USABLE(mp)) ||
+	    range.len < mp->m_sb.sb_blocksize)
 		return -XFS_ERROR(EINVAL);
 
 	start = BTOBB(range.start);
-- 
2.0.0

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/