Re: scsi-mq V2

[Jens Axboe]

On 06/25/2014 10:50 PM, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 2014-06-25 10:51, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> This is the second post of the scsi-mq series.
>>
>> At this point the code is ready for merging and use by developers and
>> early
>> adopters.  The core blk-mq code isn't that suitable for slow devices
>> yet, mostly due to the lack of an I/O scheduler, but Jens is working
>> on it.
>> Similarly there is no dm-multipath support for drivers using blk-mq yet,
>> but I'm working on it.  It should also be noted that the code doesn't
>> actually support multiple hardware queues or fine grained tuning of the
>> blk-mq parameters yet.  All these could be added fairly easily as soon
>> as low-level drivers want to make use of them.
>>
>> The amount of chances to the existing code are fairly small, and mostly
>> speedups or cleanups that also apply to the old path as well.  Because
>> of this I also haven't bothered to put it under a config option, just
>> like the blk-mq core.
>>
>> The usage of blk-mq dramatically decreases CPU usage under all
>> workloads going
>> down from 100% CPU usage that the old setup can hit easily to usually
>> less
>> than 20% for maxing out storage subsystems with 512byte reads and writes,
>> and it allows to easily archive millions of IOPS.  Bart and Robert have
>> helped with some very detailed measurements that they might be able to
>> send
>> in reply to this, although these usually involve significantly
>> reworked low
>> level drivers to avoid other bottle necks.
>>
>> One major objection to previous iterations of this code was the simple
>> replacement of the host_lock with atomic counters for the host and busy
>> counters.  The host_lock avoidance on it's own already improves
>> performance,
>> and with the patch to avoid maintaining the per-target busy counter
>> unless
>> needed we now replace a lock round trip on the host_lock with just a
>> single
>> atomic increment in the submission path, and a single atomic decrement in
>> completion path, which should provide benefits even for the oddest RISC
>> architecture.  Longer term I'd still love to get rid of these entirely
>> and use the counters in blk-mq, but due to the difference in how they
>> are maintained this doesn't seem feasible as long as we still need to
>> support the legacy request code path.
>>
>> Changes from V1:
>>   - rebased on top of the core-for-3.17 branch, most notable the
>>     scsi logging changes
>>   - fixed handling of cmd_list to prevent crashes for some heavy
>>     workloads
>>   - fixed incorrect handling of !target->can_queue
>>   - avoid scheduling a workqueue on I/O completions when no queues
>>     are congested
>>
>> In addition to the patches in this thread there also is a git
>> available at:
>>
>>     git://git.infradead.org/users/hch/scsi.git scsi-mq.2
> 
> You can add my acked/reviewed-by to the series.

Ran stress testing from Friday to now, 65h of beating up on it and no
problems observed. 47TB read and 20TB written for a total of 17.7
billion of IOs issued and completed. Latencies look good. I officially
declare this code for bug free.

Bug-free-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxx>

Now lets get this queued up for inclusion, pretty please.

-- 
Jens Axboe

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/