Re: lzo1x_decompress_safe: Macro compares unsigned to 0 (NO_EFFECT)

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 09:34:44AM -0600, Don A. Bailey wrote:
> In the case of macro instances that include a '0', the overflow test is
> purposefully benign. We don't need a test for these cases. It was easy to throw
> a '0' in there to accommodate for the new two-param call. But, to appease
> Coverity, a second single-param macro that doesn't check for overflow could be
> created. 

Not needed, we don't need to "apease" coverity :)

Let's just leave this as-is.

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/