Re: [PATCH v4 0/2] rcu: uninline rcu_lock_acquire() and rcu_lock_release()

[Paul E. McKenney]

On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 06:18:37PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> May be correct this time ;) Based on paulmck/linux-rcu.git rcu/next.
> 
> 2/2 is new and hopefully trivial. But! the numbers look suspiciously
> good, I do not understand where does the difference come from...

Probably from rcu_dereference_raw() and rcu_dereference_check(..., 1).  ;-)

Queued and kicked off testing, both mine and (indirectly) Fengguang's.

							Thanx, Paul

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/