Re: [PATCHv5 05/15] hwspinlock/omap: add support for dt nodes

[Suman Anna]

Hi Ohad,

On 07/01/2014 07:48 AM, Ohad Ben-Cohen wrote:
> Hi Suman,
> 
> On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 3:34 AM, Suman Anna <s-anna@xxxxxx> wrote:
>>  static int omap_hwspinlock_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>  {
>> -       struct hwspinlock_pdata *pdata = pdev->dev.platform_data;
>> +       struct device_node *node = pdev->dev.of_node;
>>         struct hwspinlock_device *bank;
>>         struct hwspinlock *hwlock;
>>         struct resource *res;
>>         void __iomem *io_base;
>>         int num_locks, i, ret;
>> +       int base_id = 0;
> 
> We shouldn't implicitly assume base_id is zero: let's explicitly
> protect against potential subsequent invocations of
> omap_hwspinlock_probe.
> 

Yeah, I did this since we only had 1 instance, and used the same value
as used in the non-DT legacy code. Once I fold back Patch 8 that adds
the hwlock-base-id property, this will be assigned by reading that property.

regards
Suman

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/