Re: [PATCH] cpc925_edac: Use module_platform_driver()

[Borislav Petkov]

On Mon, Jun 09, 2014 at 10:40:18PM +0800, Kefeng Wang wrote:
> Move edac_op_state assignment operations to probe, then convert to
> module_platform_drive() to eliminate boilerplate code, and use
> cpc925_printk instead of printk.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/edac/cpc925_edac.c |   33 +++++++--------------------------
>  1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/edac/cpc925_edac.c b/drivers/edac/cpc925_edac.c
> index df6575f..8e3192a 100644
> --- a/drivers/edac/cpc925_edac.c
> +++ b/drivers/edac/cpc925_edac.c
> @@ -944,6 +944,12 @@ static int cpc925_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  
>  	edac_dbg(0, "%s platform device found!\n", pdev->name);
>  
> +	cpc925_printk(KERN_INFO, CPC925_EDAC_REVISION "\n");
> +	cpc925_printk(KERN_INFO, "\t(c) 2008 Wind River Systems, Inc\n");

This will issue multiple times on a multi-node machine with several such
bridges.

The bit converting to cpc925_printk is ok and I'll take it if you create
a patch only for it.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/