Re: [PATCH] ASoC: tda998x: add a codec to the HDMI transmitter
From: Jean-Francois Moine
Date: Thu Jul 03 2014 - 12:24:15 EST
On Thu, 3 Jul 2014 16:43:25 +0100
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> What you're doing in kirkwood-i2s is providing two plain DAI links,
> and then insisting that only one can be active any any one time.
>
> A DPCM solution provides at least one frontend DAI link and at least
> one backend DAI link. Your code does not do this.
You know why I did not insert the DPCM code in the kirkwood driver: it
does not work. But, as I tested it end 2013, I still have the code.
Do you want I propose a patch?
> Which bit of "we need to support both I2S and SPDIF" in my previous
> emails was not clear. Which bit of "We should only support SPDIF
> on the Cubox" was not clear?
>
> I *fully* acknowledge that we need to support both, but I'm putting
> a _strong_ recommendation to you _with_ technical reasons why we
> should _only_ support SPDIF on the Cubox.
Sorry, I still don't see why only S/PDIF should be supported on the
Cubox. I have both, and both are working on HDMI. I hope someone will
tell me it also works on S/PDIF: there is no reason it could not.
I don't see your technical reasons: you know the constraints of each
protocol I2S and S/PDIF. If you don't want I2S, just don't declare it
in the DT (see my previous mail). You may also note that I did not put
any change relative to the Cubox DT in my patch.
--
Ken ar c'hentaà | ** Breizh ha Linux atav! **
Jef | http://moinejf.free.fr/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/