On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 11:11 AM, Raghavendra K T
<raghavendra.kt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
If this comes from some man-page,
Yes it is.
Ok, googling actually finds a fairly recent patch to fix it
http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-mm/msg70517.html
and several much older "that's not true" comments.
That said, the bugzilla entry you mentioned does mention "can't boot
3.14 now". I'm not sure what the meaning of that sentence is, though.
Does it mean "can't boot 3.14 to test it because the machine is busy",
or is it a typo and really meant 3.15, and that some bootup script
*depended* on readahead()? I don't know. It seems strange.