[PATCH v2] x86: numa: setup_node_data(): drop dead code and rename function
From: Luiz Capitulino
Date: Thu Jul 03 2014 - 18:10:47 EST
The setup_node_data() function allocates a pg_data_t object, inserts it
into the node_data[] array and initializes the following fields:
node_id, node_start_pfn and node_spanned_pages.
However, a few function calls later during the kernel boot,
free_area_init_node() re-initializes those fields, possibly with
different values. This means that the initialization done by
setup_node_data() is not used.
This causes a small glitch when running Linux as a hyperv numa guest:
[ 0.000000] SRAT: PXM 0 -> APIC 0x00 -> Node 0
[ 0.000000] SRAT: PXM 0 -> APIC 0x01 -> Node 0
[ 0.000000] SRAT: PXM 1 -> APIC 0x02 -> Node 1
[ 0.000000] SRAT: PXM 1 -> APIC 0x03 -> Node 1
[ 0.000000] SRAT: Node 0 PXM 0 [mem 0x00000000-0x7fffffff]
[ 0.000000] SRAT: Node 1 PXM 1 [mem 0x80200000-0xf7ffffff]
[ 0.000000] SRAT: Node 1 PXM 1 [mem 0x100000000-0x1081fffff]
[ 0.000000] NUMA: Node 1 [mem 0x80200000-0xf7ffffff] + [mem 0x100000000-0x1081fffff] -> [mem 0x80200000-0x1081fffff]
[ 0.000000] Initmem setup node 0 [mem 0x00000000-0x7fffffff]
[ 0.000000] NODE_DATA [mem 0x7ffdc000-0x7ffeffff]
[ 0.000000] Initmem setup node 1 [mem 0x80800000-0x1081fffff]
[ 0.000000] NODE_DATA [mem 0x1081ea000-0x1081fdfff]
[ 0.000000] crashkernel: memory value expected
[ 0.000000] [ffffea0000000000-ffffea0001ffffff] PMD -> [ffff88007de00000-ffff88007fdfffff] on node 0
[ 0.000000] [ffffea0002000000-ffffea00043fffff] PMD -> [ffff880105600000-ffff8801077fffff] on node 1
[ 0.000000] Zone ranges:
[ 0.000000] DMA [mem 0x00001000-0x00ffffff]
[ 0.000000] DMA32 [mem 0x01000000-0xffffffff]
[ 0.000000] Normal [mem 0x100000000-0x1081fffff]
[ 0.000000] Movable zone start for each node
[ 0.000000] Early memory node ranges
[ 0.000000] node 0: [mem 0x00001000-0x0009efff]
[ 0.000000] node 0: [mem 0x00100000-0x7ffeffff]
[ 0.000000] node 1: [mem 0x80200000-0xf7ffffff]
[ 0.000000] node 1: [mem 0x100000000-0x1081fffff]
[ 0.000000] On node 0 totalpages: 524174
[ 0.000000] DMA zone: 64 pages used for memmap
[ 0.000000] DMA zone: 21 pages reserved
[ 0.000000] DMA zone: 3998 pages, LIFO batch:0
[ 0.000000] DMA32 zone: 8128 pages used for memmap
[ 0.000000] DMA32 zone: 520176 pages, LIFO batch:31
[ 0.000000] On node 1 totalpages: 524288
[ 0.000000] DMA32 zone: 7672 pages used for memmap
[ 0.000000] DMA32 zone: 491008 pages, LIFO batch:31
[ 0.000000] Normal zone: 520 pages used for memmap
[ 0.000000] Normal zone: 33280 pages, LIFO batch:7
In this dmesg, the SRAT table reports that the memory range for node 1
starts at 0x80200000. However, the line starting with "Initmem" reports
that node 1 memory range starts at 0x80800000. The "Initmem" line is
reported by setup_node_data() and is wrong, because the kernel ends up
using the range as reported in the SRAT table.
This commit drops all that dead code from setup_node_data(), renames it
to alloc_node_data() and adds a printk() to free_area_init_node() so
that we report a node's memory range accurately.
Here's the same dmesg section with this patch applied:
[ 0.000000] SRAT: PXM 0 -> APIC 0x00 -> Node 0
[ 0.000000] SRAT: PXM 0 -> APIC 0x01 -> Node 0
[ 0.000000] SRAT: PXM 1 -> APIC 0x02 -> Node 1
[ 0.000000] SRAT: PXM 1 -> APIC 0x03 -> Node 1
[ 0.000000] SRAT: Node 0 PXM 0 [mem 0x00000000-0x7fffffff]
[ 0.000000] SRAT: Node 1 PXM 1 [mem 0x80200000-0xf7ffffff]
[ 0.000000] SRAT: Node 1 PXM 1 [mem 0x100000000-0x1081fffff]
[ 0.000000] NUMA: Node 1 [mem 0x80200000-0xf7ffffff] + [mem 0x100000000-0x1081fffff] -> [mem 0x80200000-0x1081fffff]
[ 0.000000] NODE_DATA(0) allocated [mem 0x7ffdc000-0x7ffeffff]
[ 0.000000] NODE_DATA(1) allocated [mem 0x1081ea000-0x1081fdfff]
[ 0.000000] crashkernel: memory value expected
[ 0.000000] [ffffea0000000000-ffffea0001ffffff] PMD -> [ffff88007de00000-ffff88007fdfffff] on node 0
[ 0.000000] [ffffea0002000000-ffffea00043fffff] PMD -> [ffff880105600000-ffff8801077fffff] on node 1
[ 0.000000] Zone ranges:
[ 0.000000] DMA [mem 0x00001000-0x00ffffff]
[ 0.000000] DMA32 [mem 0x01000000-0xffffffff]
[ 0.000000] Normal [mem 0x100000000-0x1081fffff]
[ 0.000000] Movable zone start for each node
[ 0.000000] Early memory node ranges
[ 0.000000] node 0: [mem 0x00001000-0x0009efff]
[ 0.000000] node 0: [mem 0x00100000-0x7ffeffff]
[ 0.000000] node 1: [mem 0x80200000-0xf7ffffff]
[ 0.000000] node 1: [mem 0x100000000-0x1081fffff]
[ 0.000000] Initmem setup node 0 [mem 0x00001000-0x7ffeffff]
[ 0.000000] On node 0 totalpages: 524174
[ 0.000000] DMA zone: 64 pages used for memmap
[ 0.000000] DMA zone: 21 pages reserved
[ 0.000000] DMA zone: 3998 pages, LIFO batch:0
[ 0.000000] DMA32 zone: 8128 pages used for memmap
[ 0.000000] DMA32 zone: 520176 pages, LIFO batch:31
[ 0.000000] Initmem setup node 1 [mem 0x80200000-0x1081fffff]
[ 0.000000] On node 1 totalpages: 524288
[ 0.000000] DMA32 zone: 7672 pages used for memmap
[ 0.000000] DMA32 zone: 491008 pages, LIFO batch:31
[ 0.000000] Normal zone: 520 pages used for memmap
[ 0.000000] Normal zone: 33280 pages, LIFO batch:7
This commit was tested on a two node bare-metal NUMA machine and Linux
as a numa guest on hyperv and qemu/kvm.
PS: The wrong memory range reported by setup_node_data() seems to be
harmless in the current kernel because it's just not used. However,
that bad range is used in kernel 2.6.32 to initialize the old boot
memory allocator, which causes a crash during boot.
Signed-off-by: Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
v2
- Restore Initmem text when reporting the memory range in dmesg [David]
o David, Andrew: I'm sending v2 instead of sending an incremental patch
because I had to update the commit log.
arch/x86/include/asm/numa.h | 1 -
arch/x86/mm/numa.c | 34 ++++++++++++++--------------------
mm/page_alloc.c | 2 ++
3 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/numa.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/numa.h
index 4064aca..01b493e 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/numa.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/numa.h
@@ -9,7 +9,6 @@
#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
#define NR_NODE_MEMBLKS (MAX_NUMNODES*2)
-#define ZONE_ALIGN (1UL << (MAX_ORDER+PAGE_SHIFT))
/*
* Too small node sizes may confuse the VM badly. Usually they
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/numa.c b/arch/x86/mm/numa.c
index a32b706..d221374 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/numa.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/numa.c
@@ -185,8 +185,8 @@ int __init numa_add_memblk(int nid, u64 start, u64 end)
return numa_add_memblk_to(nid, start, end, &numa_meminfo);
}
-/* Initialize NODE_DATA for a node on the local memory */
-static void __init setup_node_data(int nid, u64 start, u64 end)
+/* Allocate NODE_DATA for a node on the local memory */
+static void __init alloc_node_data(int nid)
{
const size_t nd_size = roundup(sizeof(pg_data_t), PAGE_SIZE);
u64 nd_pa;
@@ -194,18 +194,6 @@ static void __init setup_node_data(int nid, u64 start, u64 end)
int tnid;
/*
- * Don't confuse VM with a node that doesn't have the
- * minimum amount of memory:
- */
- if (end && (end - start) < NODE_MIN_SIZE)
- return;
-
- start = roundup(start, ZONE_ALIGN);
-
- printk(KERN_INFO "Initmem setup node %d [mem %#010Lx-%#010Lx]\n",
- nid, start, end - 1);
-
- /*
* Allocate node data. Try node-local memory and then any node.
* Never allocate in DMA zone.
*/
@@ -222,7 +210,7 @@ static void __init setup_node_data(int nid, u64 start, u64 end)
nd = __va(nd_pa);
/* report and initialize */
- printk(KERN_INFO " NODE_DATA [mem %#010Lx-%#010Lx]\n",
+ printk(KERN_INFO "NODE_DATA(%d) allocated [mem %#010Lx-%#010Lx]\n", nid,
nd_pa, nd_pa + nd_size - 1);
tnid = early_pfn_to_nid(nd_pa >> PAGE_SHIFT);
if (tnid != nid)
@@ -230,9 +218,6 @@ static void __init setup_node_data(int nid, u64 start, u64 end)
node_data[nid] = nd;
memset(NODE_DATA(nid), 0, sizeof(pg_data_t));
- NODE_DATA(nid)->node_id = nid;
- NODE_DATA(nid)->node_start_pfn = start >> PAGE_SHIFT;
- NODE_DATA(nid)->node_spanned_pages = (end - start) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
node_set_online(nid);
}
@@ -523,8 +508,17 @@ static int __init numa_register_memblks(struct numa_meminfo *mi)
end = max(mi->blk[i].end, end);
}
- if (start < end)
- setup_node_data(nid, start, end);
+ if (start >= end)
+ continue;
+
+ /*
+ * Don't confuse VM with a node that doesn't have the
+ * minimum amount of memory:
+ */
+ if (end && (end - start) < NODE_MIN_SIZE)
+ continue;
+
+ alloc_node_data(nid);
}
/* Dump memblock with node info and return. */
diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
index 20d17f8..9c699e7 100644
--- a/mm/page_alloc.c
+++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
@@ -4957,6 +4957,8 @@ void __paginginit free_area_init_node(int nid, unsigned long *zones_size,
pgdat->node_start_pfn = node_start_pfn;
#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_MEMBLOCK_NODE_MAP
get_pfn_range_for_nid(nid, &start_pfn, &end_pfn);
+ printk(KERN_INFO "Initmem setup node %d [mem %#010Lx-%#010Lx]\n", nid,
+ (u64) start_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT, (u64) (end_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT) - 1);
#endif
calculate_node_totalpages(pgdat, start_pfn, end_pfn,
zones_size, zholes_size);
--
1.9.3
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/