Re: [PATCH] ix86: fix vDSO build

[Boris Ostrovsky]

On 07/03/2014 10:35 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
> Relying on static functions used just once to get inlined (and
> subsequently have dead code paths eliminated) is wrong: Compilers are
> free to decide whether they do this, regardless of optimization level.
> With this not happening for vdso_addr() (observed with gcc 4.1.x), an
> unresolved reference to align_vdso_addr() causes the build to fail.

Tested-by: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@xxxxxxxxxx>

> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>   arch/x86/vdso/vma.c    |    4 ++++
>   1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> --- 3.16-rc3/arch/x86/vdso/vma.c
> +++ 3.16-rc3-x86-vdso-build/arch/x86/vdso/vma.c
> @@ -62,6 +62,9 @@ struct linux_binprm;
>      Only used for the 64-bit and x32 vdsos. */
>   static unsigned long vdso_addr(unsigned long start, unsigned len)
>   {
> +#ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
> +	return 0;
> +#else
>   	unsigned long addr, end;
>   	unsigned offset;
>   	end = (start + PMD_SIZE - 1) & PMD_MASK;
> @@ -83,6 +86,7 @@ static unsigned long vdso_addr(unsigned
>   	addr = align_vdso_addr(addr);
>   
>   	return addr;
> +#endif
>   }
>   
>   static int map_vdso(const struct vdso_image *image, bool calculate_addr)
>
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/