Re: [PATCH 1/4] drm/dsi: Add flag for continuous clock behavior
From: Alexandre Courbot
Date: Fri Jul 04 2014 - 01:57:56 EST
Hi Andrejz,
On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 5:23 PM, Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi Alexandre,
>
> Thanks for the patch.
>
> On 07/02/2014 02:19 PM, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
>> As per section 5.6.1 of the DSI specification, all DSI transmitters must
>> support continuous clock behavior on the clock lane, while non-continuous
>> mode support is only optional. Add a flag that allows devices to indicate
>> that they require continuous clock mode to operate properly.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> include/drm/drm_mipi_dsi.h | 2 ++
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/drm/drm_mipi_dsi.h b/include/drm/drm_mipi_dsi.h
>> index 944f33f..5913ef4 100644
>> --- a/include/drm/drm_mipi_dsi.h
>> +++ b/include/drm/drm_mipi_dsi.h
>> @@ -94,6 +94,8 @@ void mipi_dsi_host_unregister(struct mipi_dsi_host *host);
>> #define MIPI_DSI_MODE_VSYNC_FLUSH BIT(8)
>> /* disable EoT packets in HS mode */
>> #define MIPI_DSI_MODE_EOT_PACKET BIT(9)
>> +/* use continuous clock behavior on the clock lane */
>> +#define MIPI_DSI_MODE_CLOCK_CONTINUOUS BIT(10)
>>
>
> According to MIPI DSI specification "All DSI transmitters and receivers
> shall support continuous clock behavior on the Clock Lane, and
> optionally may support non-continuous clock behavior". It suggests that
> continuous clock should be default behavior. So maybe better is to
> introduce sth like:
> +#define MIPI_DSI_MODE_CLOCK_NON_CONTINUOUS BIT(10)
I started under the assumption that current host drivers assumed
non-continuous clock (as the Tegra driver currently does). In that
light, it seemed to make sense (and to be less intrusive) to introduce
that flag as a restriction rather than a capability. But if you think
this should be a capability I am not strongly against it - either way,
host drivers need to be changed to take that flag into account.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/