Re: [PATCH] mach-omap2: Change if statement in omap2_dflt_clk_enable

[Paul Walmsley]

On Fri, 4 Jul 2014, Nicholas Krause wrote:

> This patch changes this function to check for if v is returning value from the
> called function. If not it does the else. Furthermore fixes the FIXME message above
> if statement for holding INVERT_ENABLE bit when not needing to be checked for
> in if statement by just checking for if v is not Null.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Nicholas Krause <xerofoify@xxxxxxxxx>

This patch doesn't make any sense.  Neither does the commit message.  
Please explain exactly what this patch is intended to do in terms of the 
clock framework or the hardware.


- Paul

> ---
>  arch/arm/mach-omap2/clock.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/clock.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/clock.c
> index 591581a..626363d 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/clock.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/clock.c
> @@ -379,7 +379,7 @@ void omap2_dflt_clk_disable(struct clk_hw *hw)
>  	}
>  
>  	v = omap2_clk_readl(clk, clk->enable_reg);
> -	if (clk->flags & INVERT_ENABLE)
> +	if (v)
>  		v |= (1 << clk->enable_bit);
>  	else
>  		v &= ~(1 << clk->enable_bit);
> -- 
> 1.9.1
> 


- Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/