Re: [PATCH 3.10 00/46] 3.10.47-stable review

[Satoru Takeuchi]

At Fri, 04 Jul 2014 22:43:40 -0700,
Guenter Roeck wrote:
> 
> On 07/04/2014 03:19 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.10.47 release.
> > There are 46 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> > 
> > Responses should be made by Sun Jul  6 22:15:52 UTC 2014.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > 
> 
> Build results:
> 	total: 144 pass: 125 skipped: 6 fail: 13
> Failed builds:
> 	alpha:allmodconfig
> 	i386:defconfig
> 	i386:allyesconfig
> 	i386:allmodconfig
> 	powerpc:allmodconfig (binutils 2.23)
> 	powerpc:allmodconfig (binutils 2.24)
> 	score:defconfig
> 	sparc64:allmodconfig
> 	unicore32:defconfig
> 	x86_64:defconfig
> 	x86_64:allyesconfig
> 	x86_64:allmodconfig
> 	xtensa:allmodconfig
> 
> Qemu test for x86 failed with a build error.
> 
> This is not as expected. New build error is always the same as far as I can see:
> 
> sound/pci/hda/patch_sigmatel.c: In function 'stac92hd95_fixup_hp_led':
> sound/pci/hda/patch_sigmatel.c:3578:3: error: implicit declaration of function 'codec_dbg' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]


Failed with the following log. It's also the same as Guenter's problem.
Probably both 3.14.11-rc1 and 3.10.11-rc1 hit the same problem.

===============================================================================
...
/home/sat/src/test-linux-stable/linux-stable/sound/pci/hda/patch_sigmatel.c: In function ʽstac92hd95_fixup_hp_ledʼ:  
/home/sat/src/test-linux-stable/linux-stable/sound/pci/hda/patch_sigmatel.c:3578:3: error: implicit declaration of function ʽcodec_dbgʼ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]  
   codec_dbg(codec, "mute LED gpio %d polarity %d\n",  
   ^  
...
  CC      net/ipv6/icmp.o  
cc1: some warnings being treated as errors  
/home/sat/src/test-linux-stable/linux-stable/scripts/Makefile.build:308: recipe for target 'sound/pci/hda/patch_sigmatel.o' failed  
make[4]: *** [sound/pci/hda/patch_sigmatel.o] Error 1  
/home/sat/src/test-linux-stable/linux-stable/scripts/Makefile.build:455: recipe for target 'sound/pci/hda' failed  
make[3]: *** [sound/pci/hda] Error 2  
/home/sat/src/test-linux-stable/linux-stable/scripts/Makefile.build:455: recipe for target 'sound/pci' failed  
make[2]: *** [sound/pci] Error 2  
/home/sat/src/test-linux-stable/linux-stable/Makefile:795: recipe for target 'sound' failed  
make[1]: *** [sound] Error 2  
...
  LD      net/built-in.o
Makefile:130: recipe for target 'sub-make' failed
make: *** [sub-make] Error 2
FAILED!
CRITICAL FAILURE... failed build
===============================================================================

 - Test Cases:
   - Build this kernel.
   - Boot this kernel.
   - Build the latest mainline kernel with this kernel.

 - Test Tool:
   https://github.com/satoru-takeuchi/test-linux-stable

 - Test Result (kernel .config, ktest config and test log):
   http://satoru-takeuchi.org/test-linux-stable/results/<version>-<test datetime>.tar.xz

 - Build Environment:
   - OS: Debian Jessy x86_64
   - CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-2400 CPU @ 3.10GHz x 4
   - memory: 8GB

 - Test Target Environment:
   - Debian Jessy x86_64 (KVM guest on the Build Environment)
   - # of vCPU: 2
   - memory: 2GB

Thanks,
Satoru

> 
> Guenter
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/