Re: linux-next: Tree for Jul 4

From: Nick Krause
Date: Sun Jul 06 2014 - 01:21:17 EST


Sorry my mistake some of this are wrong I will resend.
Cheers Nick

On Sun, Jul 6, 2014 at 1:17 AM, Nick Krause <xerofoify@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Here are my test logs for arm. Most of the failures from these builds
> not having default configures or make one by one errors. Below are
> my typed results.
> Results
> iop13xx_defconfig - Successes in my tests
> mackerel_defconfig - Fails in my tests
> nuc910_defconfig - Fails in my tests
> nuc950_defconfig -Fails in my tests
> nuc960_defconfig - Fails in my tests
> s5p64x0_defconfig - Fails in my tests
> s5p64x0_defconfig - Fails in my tests
> arm-randconfig -Fails in my tests
> BF561-ACVILON_defconfig -Fails in my tests
> BlackStamp_defconfig - Fails in my tests
> TCM-BF518_defconfig - Fails in my tests
>
> Cheers Nick
>
> On Sun, Jul 6, 2014 at 12:54 AM, Nick Krause <xerofoify@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Hey guys ,
>> I checking Sachin Karmat's tests and fixing compile issues with
>> patches if need be. In my next email I am going to give a up to date
>> log of still failing builds for arm.
>> Cheers Nick
>>
>> On Sat, Jul 5, 2014 at 10:57 AM, Sachin Kamat <spk.linux@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> On Sat, Jul 5, 2014 at 6:18 AM, J. Bruce Fields <bfields@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>> On Sat, Jul 05, 2014 at 01:10:58AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>>>>> Hi Sachin,
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, 4 Jul 2014 14:12:11 +0530 Sachin Kamat <spk.linux@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Was bisecting a kernel crash on Arndale octa board (Exynos5420). It
>>>>> > points to a merge
>>>>> > commit:
>>>>> > 40556a4c485d12d324f1ea196cc30f590e564237 is the first bad commit
>>>>> > ("Merge remote-tracking branch 'nfsd/nfsd-next'").
>>>>> >
>>>>> > How do I proceed with this?
>>>>>
>>>>> I guess we get the owner of the tree (possibly) in question involved
>>>>> (cc'd).
>>>>
>>>> Looking at the total diffstat for that branch, it's almost all contained
>>>> in fs/nfsd with a little in include/linux/sunrpc/ and net/sunrpc. So
>>>> it's extremely unlikely that it would be causing a problem unless you're
>>>> actually testing nfsd.
>>>
>>> I found it surprising too as I do not use nfsd. I will try out the things
>>> suggested by Stephen and update.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Regards,
>>> Sachin.
>>> --
>>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
>>> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/