Re: [PATCH] x86: Make x2APIC support depend on interrupt remapping or guest support

[Gleb Natapov]

On Sun, Jul 06, 2014 at 05:49:09PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2014-07-06 17:41, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> > On Sun, Jul 06, 2014 at 05:24:27PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> >> On 2014-07-06 17:12, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> >>> On Sat, Jul 05, 2014 at 09:47:54AM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> >>>> From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>>>
> >>>> We are able to use x2APIC mode in the absence of interrupt remapping on
> >>>> certain hypervisors. So it if fine to disable IRQ_REMAP without having
> >>>> to give up x2APIC support.
> >>> FWIW I did similar thing back when I added x2apic to KVM:
> >>> http://linux.derkeiler.com/Mailing-Lists/Kernel/2009-06/msg14579.html
> >>> But was advised against it.
> >>
> >> I don't get the point from that thread.
> > It is not architectural to use x2apic without irq remapping, so Suresh
> 
> Slightly off-topic for this patch: Is this dependency documented
> somewhere? I guess there are broken systems where it can fail, but none
> of the (Intel) boxes I tried so far had problems with x2APIC mode on
> (given APIC IDs < 255) and IRQ remapping disabled.
Not sure I saw that written, but I was told many times that this is so.

--
			Gleb.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/