Re: [PATCH] appletalk: Set skb with destructor

[Eric Dumazet]

On Mon, 2014-07-07 at 10:57 +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Mon, 2014-07-07 at 11:03 +0300, Andrey Utkin wrote:
> > 2014-07-07 0:42 GMT+03:00 Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@xxxxxxxxx>:
> > >>       /* Queue packet (standard) */
> > >> +     sock_hold(sock);
> > >> +     skb->destructor = atalk_skb_destructor;
> > >>       skb->sk = sock;
> > >
> > > This part is not needed : sock_queue_rcv_skb() already does the right
> > > thing : It calls skb_set_owner_r(skb, sk);
> > >
> > > You should therefore remove the "skb->sk = sock;" line
> > 
> > If it is so, i think this should be as another patch with its own reasoning.
> > 
> 
> No it is not.
> 
> Its illegal to set skb->sk to a socket without taking proper reference.
> 
> But it is useless to do this before calling sock_queue_rcv_skb(), as I
> explained to you.
> 
> This is adding two extra atomic operations for nothing: skb_orphan() is
> called from sock_queue_rcv_skb(), so it is kind of stupid to set a
> destructor that _will_ be immediately called.
> 
> We do not do defensive programming, we try to do logical things, and
> only logical things.
> 
> Please re-spin your patch, by integrating my feedback.
> 
> Thanks !

Reading again this code, I think all you need is to remove the 2 buggy
lines.

No need for setup destructors.



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/