Re: [PATCH] appletalk: Set skb with destructor

[Eric Dumazet]

On Mon, 2014-07-07 at 13:02 +0300, Andrey Utkin wrote:
> 2014-07-07 12:26 GMT+03:00 Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@xxxxxxxxx>:
> > Reading again this code, I think all you need is to remove the 2 buggy
> > lines.
> >
> > No need for setup destructors.
> 
> Reviewing the code again, i find you're right and adding a destructor
> in that place is stupid, and just not setting skb->sk would make bug
> disappear, assuming skb->sk is previously NULL.
> And what about the second case, at ddp.c near line 1650? Is destructor
> needed here?

Not needed at all.

There is already a proper destructor set by sock_alloc_send_skb()

As I said, all you need is to remove the 2 lines.

Something like :

diff --git a/net/appletalk/ddp.c b/net/appletalk/ddp.c
index 01a1082e02b3..5563dcb7a1fc 100644
--- a/net/appletalk/ddp.c
+++ b/net/appletalk/ddp.c
@@ -1489,7 +1489,6 @@ static int atalk_rcv(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev,
 		goto drop;
 
 	/* Queue packet (standard) */
-	skb->sk = sock;
 
 	if (sock_queue_rcv_skb(sock, skb) < 0)
 		goto drop;
@@ -1644,7 +1643,6 @@ static int atalk_sendmsg(struct kiocb *iocb, struct socket *sock, struct msghdr
 	if (!skb)
 		goto out;
 
-	skb->sk = sk;
 	skb_reserve(skb, ddp_dl->header_length);
 	skb_reserve(skb, dev->hard_header_len);
 	skb->dev = dev;


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/