Re: [RFC 2/7] hrtimer: don't check for active hrtimer after adding it

From: Chris Redpath
Date: Wed Jul 09 2014 - 06:34:21 EST


Hi Viresh,

On 09/07/14 07:55, Viresh Kumar wrote:
hrtimer_start*() family never fails to enqueue a hrtimer to a clock-base. The
only special case is when the hrtimer was in past. If it is getting enqueued to
local CPUs's clock-base, we raise a softirq and exit, else we handle that on
next interrupt on remote CPU.

At several places in the kernel, we try to make sure if hrtimer was added
properly or not by calling hrtimer_active(), like:

hrtimer_start(timer, expires, mode);
if (hrtimer_active(timer)) {
/* Added successfully */
} else {
/* Was added in the past */
}

As hrtimer_start*() never fails, hrtimer_active() is guaranteed to return '1'.
So, there is no point calling hrtimer_active().

This patch updates hrtimer core to get this fixed.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
kernel/hrtimer.c | 4 ----
1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/hrtimer.c b/kernel/hrtimer.c
index cf40209..a76f962 100644
--- a/kernel/hrtimer.c
+++ b/kernel/hrtimer.c
@@ -1555,8 +1555,6 @@ static int __sched do_nanosleep(struct hrtimer_sleeper *t, enum hrtimer_mode mod
do {
set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
hrtimer_start_expires(&t->timer, mode);
- if (!hrtimer_active(&t->timer))
- t->task = NULL;

if (likely(t->task))
freezable_schedule();
@@ -1837,8 +1835,6 @@ schedule_hrtimeout_range_clock(ktime_t *expires, unsigned long delta,
hrtimer_init_sleeper(&t, current);

hrtimer_start_expires(&t.timer, mode);
- if (!hrtimer_active(&t.timer))
- t.task = NULL;

if (likely(t.task))
schedule();


Maybe safe to remove this if condition too.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/