Re: [PATCH next-20140704]: staging/rtl8821ae/base.c: sparse warning corrections
From: Andev
Date: Wed Jul 09 2014 - 15:38:52 EST
On Sun, Jul 6, 2014 at 5:01 AM, Sami Laine <laine.j.sami@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> From: Sami Laine <laine.j.sami@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> Sparse warning corrections for:
>
> drivers/staging/rtl8821ae/base.c:1370:16: warning: symbol 'rtl_make_smps_action' was not declared. Should it be static?
> drivers/staging/rtl8821ae/base.c:1543:6: warning: symbol 'rtl_find_221_ie' was not declared. Should it be static?
> drivers/staging/rtl8821ae/base.c:1804:5: warning: symbol 'rtl_core_module_init' was not declared. Should it be static?
> drivers/staging/rtl8821ae/base.c:1820:6: warning: symbol 'rtl_core_module_exit' was not declared. Should it be static?
>
> Signed-off-by: Sami Laine <laine.j.sami@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8821ae/base.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8821ae/base.c
> index 4a36da0..c2d0b18 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8821ae/base.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8821ae/base.c
> @@ -1367,7 +1367,7 @@ u8 *rtl_find_ie(u8 *data, unsigned int len, u8 ie)
>
> /* when we use 2 rx ants we send IEEE80211_SMPS_OFF */
> /* when we use 1 rx ant we send IEEE80211_SMPS_STATIC */
> -struct sk_buff *rtl_make_smps_action(struct ieee80211_hw *hw,
> +static struct sk_buff *rtl_make_smps_action(struct ieee80211_hw *hw,
> enum ieee80211_smps_mode smps,
> u8 *da, u8 *bssid)
> {
> @@ -1540,7 +1540,7 @@ static bool rtl_chk_vendor_ouisub(struct ieee80211_hw *hw,
> return matched;
> }
>
> -bool rtl_find_221_ie(struct ieee80211_hw *hw, u8 *data,
> +static bool rtl_find_221_ie(struct ieee80211_hw *hw, u8 *data,
> unsigned int len)
> {
> struct ieee80211_mgmt *mgmt = (void *)data;
> @@ -1801,7 +1801,7 @@ MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Realtek 802.11n PCI wireless core");
> #endif
> struct rtl_global_var global_var = {};
>
> -int rtl_core_module_init(void)
> +static int rtl_core_module_init(void)
> {
> if (rtl_rate_control_register())
> printk(KERN_DEBUG "rtl: Unable to register rtl_rc, use default RC !!\n");
> @@ -1815,8 +1815,9 @@ int rtl_core_module_init(void)
>
> return 0;
> }
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(rtl_core_module_init);
Why are you adding this? Just declaring it static should be enough if
you are not using this elsewhere.
>
> -void rtl_core_module_exit(void)
> +static void rtl_core_module_exit(void)
> {
> /*RC*/
> rtl_rate_control_unregister();
> @@ -1824,6 +1825,7 @@ void rtl_core_module_exit(void)
> /* add proc for debug */
> rtl_proc_remove_topdir();
> }
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(rtl_core_module_exit);
same here.
>
> #if 0
> module_init(rtl_core_module_init);
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
--
Andev
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/