Re: [PATCH v7 10/33] net: dummy - set name assign type
From: Tom Gundersen
Date: Thu Jul 10 2014 - 06:34:22 EST
On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 12:26 PM, David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> The same goes for NET_NAME_USER and NET_NAME_RENAMED. These are the same
>>> from a kernel point of view.
>> You mean to collapse the two, and just label renamed interfaces
>> NET_NAME_USER instead?
> I have no real objections to merging NAME_USER and NAME_RENAMED. Both
> values imply that there is a user-space authority that applied some
> kind of rules to the naming-scheme. Therefore, anyone reacting to
> those names should better treat them equally and fix the
> naming-authority instead of overwriting it.
I basically agree. There is no strong reason to keep these separate,
so I would not object strongly to merging them.
However, I also don't see any harm in keeping the distinction. If
userspace wants to treat them the same, it easily can. However, if a
usecase appears in the future where the distinction is important, we
can no longer split them apart again. For that reason, I'd slightly
prefer keeping them separate, unless there is a compelling reason not
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/