Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: report driver's successful {un}registration

[Viresh Kumar]

On 10 July 2014 17:29, Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 05:21:43PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
>> So that it appears in boot logs and we know cpufreq registered properly.
>
> So flip that logic: Don't say anything in the success case and issue an
> error only when it failed. Like the rest of the code does it.

The problem with that is: CPUFreq may not be compiled in at all and
we wouldn't know the difference between success and absence.

And so tried to add a print, like any other driver would do.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/