Re: [PATCH v6 0/6] ima: extending secure boot certificate chain of trust

[Dmitry Kasatkin]

Hi David,

If patches from integrity/next-trusted-keys goes via your tree, then I
suggest that you re-base your patches on the top of our
patchset, because it is unclear how long review of PE, PKCS7 patches
will take and if they will be pulled...

I would do it with different pull requests.

- Dmitry


On 10/07/14 00:29, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-07-09 at 19:56 +0100, David Howells wrote: 
>> Mimi Zohar <zohar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>> Yes, that's fine.  My concern, however, is that the trusted keyring
>>> patches are independent of the other patches being upstreamed and should
>>> be upstreamed regardless of the other patches.
>> There is overlap in the X.509 certificate request function that you took from
>> my pkcs#7 patches.
> Right, x509_request_asymmetric_key() is the same as
> pkcs7_request_asymmetric_key().
>
> Mimi
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-security-module" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/