Re: [patch 54/55] timekeeping: Provide fast and NMI safe access to CLOCK_MONOTONIC[_RAW]
From: Mathieu Desnoyers
Date: Sat Jul 12 2014 - 10:00:03 EST
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: "Mathieu Desnoyers" <mathieu.desnoyers@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: "LKML" <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "John Stultz" <john.stultz@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Peter Zijlstra"
> <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Steven Rostedt" <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Saturday, July 12, 2014 4:11:17 AM
> Subject: Re: [patch 54/55] timekeeping: Provide fast and NMI safe access to CLOCK_MONOTONIC[_RAW]
>
> On Fri, 11 Jul 2014, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
>
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > To: "LKML" <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Cc: "John Stultz" <john.stultz@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Peter Zijlstra"
> > > <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Steven Rostedt"
> > > <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "Mathieu Desnoyers"
> > > <mathieu.desnoyers@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Sent: Friday, July 11, 2014 9:45:19 AM
> > > Subject: [patch 54/55] timekeeping: Provide fast and NMI safe access to
> > > CLOCK_MONOTONIC[_RAW]
> > > On the update side:
> > >
> > > tkf->seq++;
> > > smp_wmb();
> > > update(tkf->base[0], tk;
> >
> > missing ")"
>
> :)
>
> > Any reason why the updater wouldn't do:
> >
> > tkf->seq++;
> > smp_wmb();
> > update(tkf->base[1 - (tkf->seq & 0x01)], tk);
> >
> > instead of updating both array entries each time ?
>
> base[0]; <- Current active
> seq++; -> Makes base[1] the active one for readers
> update(base[0]);
>
> So readers are always one update cycle behind. Probably not an issue
> most of the time, but think about fast wrapping clocksources and
> NOHZ....
Ah, yep, got it.
So instead of calling update() twice per update, could we do
the following instead ?
tkf->seq++;
smp_wmb();
update(tkf->base[0], tk);
tkf->seq++;
smp_wmb();
memcpy(tkf->base[1], tkf->base[0], sizeof(tkf->base[1]);
just in case "update" would happen to be expensive for
some clock implementation.
Thanks,
Mathieu
>
> Thanks,
>
> tglx
>
>
>
--
Mathieu Desnoyers
EfficiOS Inc.
http://www.efficios.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/