Re: Is espfix64's double-fault thing OK on Xen?

[Andy Lutomirski]

On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 10:11 AM, Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 10:04 AM, H. Peter Anvin <hpa@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On 07/09/2014 04:17 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>>> This part in __do_double_fault looks fishy:
>>>
>>>     cmpl $__KERNEL_CS,CS(%rdi)
>>>     jne do_double_fault
>>>
>>> Shouldn't that be:
>>>
>>>     test $3,CS(%rdi)
>>>     jnz do_double_fault
>>>
>>
>> No, it should be fine.  The *only* case where we need to do the espfix
>> magic is when we are on __KERNEL_CS.
>>
>
> IIRC Xen has a somewhat different GDT, and at least the userspace CS
> in IA32_STAR disagrees with normal Linux.  If the kernel CS is also
> strange, then there will be an extra possible CS value here.

There's FLAT_KERNEL_CS64, which is not equal to __KERNEL_CS.  If the
espfix mechanism gets invoked with that CS, then I expect that
something unexpected will happen.

That being said, FLAT_KERNEL_CS64 is CPL3, so my code might not be any better.

--Andy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/