Re: [PATCH] mach-s3c64xx: Remove all defintions not related to regs-clocks
From: Nick Krause
Date: Mon Jul 14 2014 - 14:56:26 EST
On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 2:45 PM, Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 07/14/14 11:40, Paul Bolle wrote:
>> On Mon, 2014-07-14 at 11:23 -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>>> On 07/14/14 11:14, Nicholas Krause wrote:
>>>> This patch addresses the fix me message in this file that states to
>>>> remove all definitions not related to reg-clocks in this header
>>>> file.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Nicholas Krause <xerofoify@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>> ---
>>>> arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/include/mach/regs-clock.h | 22 +---------------------
>>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 21 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/include/mach/regs-cloclinux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx b/arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/include/mach/regs-clock.h
>>>> index 4f44aac..46e64cc 100644
>>>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/include/mach/regs-clock.h
>>>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/include/mach/regs-clock.h
>>>> @@ -15,24 +15,4 @@
>>>> #ifndef __PLAT_REGS_CLOCK_H
>>>> #define __PLAT_REGS_CLOCK_H __FILE__
>>>>
>>>> -/*
>>>> - * FIXME: Remove remaining definitions
>>>> - */
>>>> -
>>>> -#define S3C_CLKREG(x) (S3C_VA_SYS + (x))
>>>> -
>>>> -#define S3C_PCLK_GATE S3C_CLKREG(0x34)
>>>> -#define S3C6410_CLK_SRC2 S3C_CLKREG(0x10C)
>>>> -#define S3C_MEM_SYS_CFG S3C_CLKREG(0x120)
>>>> -
>>>> -/* PCLK GATE Registers */
>>>> -#define S3C_CLKCON_PCLK_UART3 (1<<4)
>>>> -#define S3C_CLKCON_PCLK_UART2 (1<<3)
>>>> -#define S3C_CLKCON_PCLK_UART1 (1<<2)
>>>> -#define S3C_CLKCON_PCLK_UART0 (1<<1)
>>>> -
>>>> -/* MEM_SYS_CFG */
>>>> -#define MEM_SYS_CFG_INDEP_CF 0x4000
>>>> -#define MEM_SYS_CFG_EBI_FIX_PRI_CFCON 0x30
>>>> -
>>>> -#endif /* _PLAT_REGS_CLOCK_H */
>>>> +/#endif /* _PLAT_REGS_CLOCK_H */
>>>
>>> I don't know about the other changes, but that last line looks like an error.
>>> Did you build anything that #includes this header file?
>>
>> I just did
>> git grep -n S3C_CLKCON_PCLK_UART
>>
>> It was just a guess. I did not cherry pick the defines that covers! The
>> output of that command is, I think, pretty clear.
>>
>> Nicholas, I think you've been told already to stop doing what you're
>> doing again here. I try not to use colorful language on the net, but
>> you're really pushing me here.
>>
>> Please go find something other to do than grepping the kernel tree for
>> FIXMEs!
>linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Yes.
>
> FIXMEs are not a suggested starting point for kernel beginners.
> If they were easy to fix, they would already be fixed or most likely
> would never have been introduced.
>
>
> --
> ~Randy
Randy,
My mistake I didn't check the tree for files linking to these definitions.
I will be more careful ,next time.
Niclk
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/