Re: [PATCH] cpuidle: Fix Coding style reported by checkpatch.pl
From: pramod gurav
Date: Tue Jul 15 2014 - 01:12:18 EST
On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 11:38 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Monday, July 14, 2014 12:40:24 PM pramod gurav wrote:
>> Hi Rafael,
>>
>> Can we consider these changes if there are no issues with this?
>
> Well, are you "fixing" checkpatch.pl warnings just for the sake of
> this or is there a deeper reason?
>
I was browsing through the source code and found couple of them. Then
ran checkpatch.pl to see if there are more. And thought the error
"Fixed: ERROR: do not use assignment in if condition" must be fixed.
Otherwise there is no reason.
> Rafael
>
>
>> On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 4:28 PM, pramod gurav
>> <pramod.gurav.etc@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > +linux-pm
>> >
>> > On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 4:27 PM, Pramod Gurav
>> > <pramod.gurav.etc@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >> Fixed: ERROR: do not use assignment in if condition
>> >> Fixed: WARNING: EXPORT_SYMBOL should immediately follow its function
>> >> Fixed: WARNING: line over 80 characters in a comment
>> >>
>> >> CC: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> >> CC: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> >>
>> >> Signed-off-by: Pramod Gurav <pramod.gurav.etc@xxxxxxxxx>
>> >> ---
>> >> drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c | 18 ++++++++----------
>> >> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>> >>
>> >> diff --git a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c
>> >> index 8236746..2c8752e 100644
>> >> --- a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c
>> >> +++ b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c
>> >> @@ -179,7 +179,9 @@ void cpuidle_reflect(struct cpuidle_device *dev, int index)
>> >> void cpuidle_install_idle_handler(void)
>> >> {
>> >> if (enabled_devices) {
>> >> - /* Make sure all changes finished before we switch to new idle */
>> >> + /*
>> >> + * Make sure all changes finished before we switch to new idle
>> >> + */
>> >> smp_wmb();
>> >> initialized = 1;
>> >> }
>> >> @@ -204,7 +206,6 @@ void cpuidle_pause_and_lock(void)
>> >> mutex_lock(&cpuidle_lock);
>> >> cpuidle_uninstall_idle_handler();
>> >> }
>> >> -
>> >> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpuidle_pause_and_lock);
>> >>
>> >> /**
>> >> @@ -215,7 +216,6 @@ void cpuidle_resume_and_unlock(void)
>> >> cpuidle_install_idle_handler();
>> >> mutex_unlock(&cpuidle_lock);
>> >> }
>> >> -
>> >> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpuidle_resume_and_unlock);
>> >>
>> >> /* Currently used in suspend/resume path to suspend cpuidle */
>> >> @@ -267,9 +267,11 @@ int cpuidle_enable_device(struct cpuidle_device *dev)
>> >> if (ret)
>> >> return ret;
>> >>
>> >> - if (cpuidle_curr_governor->enable &&
>> >> - (ret = cpuidle_curr_governor->enable(drv, dev)))
>> >> - goto fail_sysfs;
>> >> + if (cpuidle_curr_governor->enable) {
>> >> + ret = cpuidle_curr_governor->enable(drv, dev);
>> >> + if (ret)
>> >> + goto fail_sysfs;
>> >> + }
>> >>
>> >> smp_wmb();
>> >>
>> >> @@ -283,7 +285,6 @@ fail_sysfs:
>> >>
>> >> return ret;
>> >> }
>> >> -
>> >> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpuidle_enable_device);
>> >>
>> >> /**
>> >> @@ -311,7 +312,6 @@ void cpuidle_disable_device(struct cpuidle_device *dev)
>> >> cpuidle_remove_device_sysfs(dev);
>> >> enabled_devices--;
>> >> }
>> >> -
>> >> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpuidle_disable_device);
>> >>
>> >> static void __cpuidle_unregister_device(struct cpuidle_device *dev)
>> >> @@ -399,7 +399,6 @@ out_unregister:
>> >> __cpuidle_unregister_device(dev);
>> >> goto out_unlock;
>> >> }
>> >> -
>> >> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpuidle_register_device);
>> >>
>> >> /**
>> >> @@ -423,7 +422,6 @@ void cpuidle_unregister_device(struct cpuidle_device *dev)
>> >>
>> >> cpuidle_resume_and_unlock();
>> >> }
>> >> -
>> >> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpuidle_unregister_device);
>> >>
>> >> /**
>> >> --
>> >> 1.7.9.5
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Thanks and Regards
>> > Pramod
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> --
> I speak only for myself.
> Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
Thanks and Regards
Pramod
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/