Re: bit fields && data tearing

[Richard Henderson]

On 07/15/2014 06:54 AM, Peter Hurley wrote:
> 
> Jonathan Corbet wrote a LWN article about this back in 2012:
> http://lwn.net/Articles/478657/
> 
> I guess it's fixed in gcc 4.8, but too bad there's not a workaround for
> earlier compilers (akin to -fstrict_volatile_bitfields without requiring
> the volatile keyword)

>From the gcc pr, it looks like the patch was backported to 4.7.
But we didn't fix it in versions earlier than that.


r~
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/