[PATCH 3.10 14/44] powerpc/perf: Never program book3s PMCs with values >= 0x80000000

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

3.10-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Anton Blanchard <anton@xxxxxxxxx>

commit f56029410a13cae3652d1f34788045c40a13ffc7 upstream.

We are seeing a lot of PMU warnings on POWER8:

    Can't find PMC that caused IRQ

Looking closer, the active PMC is 0 at this point and we took a PMU
exception on the transition from negative to 0. Some versions of POWER8
have an issue where they edge detect and not level detect PMC overflows.

A number of places program the PMC with (0x80000000 - period_left),
where period_left can be negative. We can either fix all of these or
just ensure that period_left is always >= 1.

This patch takes the second option.

Signed-off-by: Anton Blanchard <anton@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

---
 arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c |   17 ++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c
@@ -749,7 +749,22 @@ static void power_pmu_read(struct perf_e
 	} while (local64_cmpxchg(&event->hw.prev_count, prev, val) != prev);
 
 	local64_add(delta, &event->count);
-	local64_sub(delta, &event->hw.period_left);
+
+	/*
+	 * A number of places program the PMC with (0x80000000 - period_left).
+	 * We never want period_left to be less than 1 because we will program
+	 * the PMC with a value >= 0x800000000 and an edge detected PMC will
+	 * roll around to 0 before taking an exception. We have seen this
+	 * on POWER8.
+	 *
+	 * To fix this, clamp the minimum value of period_left to 1.
+	 */
+	do {
+		prev = local64_read(&event->hw.period_left);
+		val = prev - delta;
+		if (val < 1)
+			val = 1;
+	} while (local64_cmpxchg(&event->hw.period_left, prev, val) != prev);
 }
 
 /*


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/