Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] cpufreq: Don't destroy/realloc policy/sysfs on hotplug/suspend

From: Saravana Kannan
Date: Wed Jul 16 2014 - 15:22:26 EST


On 07/16/2014 01:30 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
On 16 July 2014 05:58, Saravana Kannan <skannan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
+ if (!cpus && cpufreq_driver->stop_cpu &&
cpufreq_driver->setpolicy) {
+ cpufreq_driver->stop_cpu(policy);
+ }


Viresh, I tried your suggestion (and my initial thought too) to combine this
as an if/else with the previous if. But the indentation got nasty and made
it hard to read. I'm sure the compiler will optimize it. So, I would prefer
to leave it this way.

Okay, I gave that comment again :)

Try this:

diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
index f72b2b7..092a0ba 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
@@ -991,8 +991,10 @@ static int cpufreq_change_policy_cpus(struct
cpufreq_policy *policy,
CPUFREQ_UPDATE_POLICY_CPU, policy);
}

- cpus = !cpumask_empty(policy->cpus);
- if (has_target() && cpus) {
+ if (!cpumask_empty(policy->cpus)) {
+ if (!has_target())
+ goto unlock;
+
ret = __cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_START);
if (!ret)
ret = __cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_LIMITS);
@@ -1001,9 +1003,7 @@ static int cpufreq_change_policy_cpus(struct
cpufreq_policy *policy,
pr_err("%s: Failed to start governor\n", __func__);
goto unlock;
}
- }
-
- if (!cpus && cpufreq_driver->stop_cpu && cpufreq_driver->setpolicy) {
+ } else if (cpufreq_driver->stop_cpu && cpufreq_driver->setpolicy) {
cpufreq_driver->stop_cpu(policy);
}


Not bad :) I'll take it.

-Saravana

--
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/