Re: [PATCHv5 0/4] mm/zpool: add common api for zswap to use zbud/zsmalloc

From: Dan Streetman
Date: Wed Jul 16 2014 - 17:06:15 EST


On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 4:59 PM, Seth Jennings <sjennings@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 02:10:42PM -0400, Dan Streetman wrote:
>> Andrew, any thoughts on this latest version of the patch set? Let me
>> know if I missed anything or you have any other suggestions.
>>
>> Seth, did you get a chance to review this and/or test it out?
>
> I did have a chance to test it out quickly and didn't run into any
> issues. Your patchset is already in linux-next so I'll test more from
> there.

This latest version has a few changes that Andrew requested, which
presumably will replace the patches that are currently in -mm and
-next; can you test with these patches instead of (or in addition to)
what's in -next?

>
> Seth
>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 5:45 PM, Dan Streetman <ddstreet@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > In order to allow zswap users to choose between zbud and zsmalloc for
>> > the compressed storage pool, this patch set adds a new api "zpool" that
>> > provides an interface to both zbud and zsmalloc. This does not include
>> > implementing shrinking in zsmalloc, which will be sent separately.
>> >
>> > I believe Seth originally was using zsmalloc for swap, but there were
>> > concerns about how significant the impact of shrinking zsmalloc would
>> > be when zswap had to start reclaiming pages. That still may be an
>> > issue, but this at least allows users to choose themselves whether
>> > they want a lower-density or higher-density compressed storage medium.
>> > At least for situations where zswap reclaim is never or rarely reached,
>> > it probably makes sense to use the higher density of zsmalloc.
>> >
>> > Note this patch set does not change zram to use zpool, although that
>> > change should be possible as well.
>> >
>> > ---
>> > Changes since v4 : https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/6/2/711
>> > -omit first patch, that removed gfp_t param from zpool_malloc()
>> > -move function doc from zpool.h to zpool.c
>> > -move module usage refcounting into patch that adds zpool
>> > -add extra refcounting to prevent driver unregister if in use
>> > -add doc clarifying concurrency usage
>> > -make zbud/zsmalloc zpool functions static
>> > -typo corrections
>> >
>> > Changes since v3 : https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/5/24/130
>> > -In zpool_shrink() use # pages instead of # bytes
>> > -Add reclaimed param to zpool_shrink() to indicate to caller
>> > # pages actually reclaimed
>> > -move module usage counting to zpool, from zbud/zsmalloc
>> > -update zbud_zpool_shrink() to call zbud_reclaim_page() in a
>> > loop until requested # pages have been reclaimed (or error)
>> >
>> > Changes since v2 : https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/5/7/927
>> > -Change zpool to use driver registration instead of hardcoding
>> > implementations
>> > -Add module use counting in zbud/zsmalloc
>> >
>> > Changes since v1 https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/4/19/97
>> > -remove zsmalloc shrinking
>> > -change zbud size param type from unsigned int to size_t
>> > -remove zpool fallback creation
>> > -zswap manually falls back to zbud if specified type fails
>> >
>> >
>> > Dan Streetman (4):
>> > mm/zbud: change zbud_alloc size type to size_t
>> > mm/zpool: implement common zpool api to zbud/zsmalloc
>> > mm/zpool: zbud/zsmalloc implement zpool
>> > mm/zpool: update zswap to use zpool
>> >
>> > include/linux/zbud.h | 2 +-
>> > include/linux/zpool.h | 106 +++++++++++++++
>> > mm/Kconfig | 43 +++---
>> > mm/Makefile | 1 +
>> > mm/zbud.c | 98 +++++++++++++-
>> > mm/zpool.c | 364 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> > mm/zsmalloc.c | 84 ++++++++++++
>> > mm/zswap.c | 75 ++++++-----
>> > 8 files changed, 722 insertions(+), 51 deletions(-)
>> > create mode 100644 include/linux/zpool.h
>> > create mode 100644 mm/zpool.c
>> >
>> > --
>> > 1.8.3.1
>> >
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/