Re: [PATCH, RFC] random: introduce getrandom(2) system call

From: Theodore Ts'o
Date: Thu Jul 17 2014 - 08:52:21 EST


On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 12:57:07PM +0200, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote:
>
> Btw. couldn't libressl etc. fall back to binary_sysctl
> kernel.random.uuid and seed with that as a last resort? We have it
> available for few more years.

Yes, they could. But trying to avoid more uses of binary_sysctl seems
to be a good thing, I think. The other thing is that is that this
interface provides is the ability to block until the entropy pool is
initialized, which isn't a big deal for x86 systems, but might be
useful as a gentle forcing function to force ARM systems to figure out
good ways of making sure the entropy pools are initialized (i.e., by
actually providing !@#!@ cycle counter) without breaking userspace
compatibility --- since this is a new interface.

> > + if (count > 256)
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > +
>
> Why this "arbitrary" limitation? Couldn't we just check for > SSIZE_MAX
> or to be more conservative to INT_MAX?

I'm not wedded to this limitation. OpenBSD's getentropy(2) has an
architected arbitrary limit of 128 bytes. I haven't made a final
decision if the right answer is to hard code some value, or make this
limit be configurable, or remote the limit entirely (which in practice
would be SSIZE_MAX or INT_MAX).

The main argument I can see for putting in a limit is to encourage the
"proper" use of the interface. In practice, anything larger than 128
probably means the interface is getting misused, either due to a bug
or some other kind of oversight.

For example, when I started instrumenting /dev/urandom, I caught
Google Chrome pulling 4k out of /dev/urandom --- twice --- at startup
time. It turns out it was the fault of the NSS library, which was
using fopen() to access /dev/urandom. (Sigh.)

- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/