Re: [PATCH v2 21/29] nios2: Futex operations

[Ley Foon Tan]

On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 7:07 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> The get_user/put_user functions really need to be annotated might_fault(),
> because that's what they do.
>
> The whole point of get_user() is to access an unchecked user space
> pointer, which  can do a number of things based on what the pointer
> points to:
>
> - access a user space variable that resides in memory
> - access a kernel pointer and fail because of the access_ok()
>   check
> - access a user space pointer that is not mapped and return
>   through the __ex_table fixup.
> - access a user space pointer that has a valid VMA but not PTE,
>   causing a page fault to be resolved.
>
> It's the last case that breaks here.
So, do you mean that we can't use get_user/put_user in futex support?
BTW, some architectures like sh,parisc, m68k use get_user in futex
function as well.
Any recommendation way to support futex if we can't use get_user.
Note, nios2 doesn't have atomic instruction.
Thanks.

Regards
Ley Foon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/