Re: [PATCH 4/7] firmware_class: perform new LSM checks

[Kees Cook]

On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 8:41 PM, James Morris <jmorris@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Jul 2014, Kees Cook wrote:
>
>> This attaches LSM hooks to the existing firmware loading interfaces:
>> filesystem-found firmware and demand-loaded blobs.
>
>>  static int fw_get_filesystem_firmware(struct device *device,
>> @@ -640,6 +646,12 @@ static ssize_t firmware_loading_store(struct device *dev,
>>               break;
>>       case 0:
>>               if (test_bit(FW_STATUS_LOADING, &fw_buf->status)) {
>> +                     if (security_kernel_fw_from_file(NULL, fw_buf->data,
>> +                                                      fw_buf->size)) {
>> +                             fw_load_abort(fw_priv);
>> +                             break;
>> +                     }
>> +
>>                       set_bit(FW_STATUS_DONE, &fw_buf->status);
>>                       clear_bit(FW_STATUS_LOADING, &fw_buf->status);
>>
>>
>
> Can you explain the loading store, and what the semantics are for an LSM
> when a NULL is passed as the file?

I'm not sure what you mean by "loading store"?

When NULL is passed as the file, it means that the firmware was passes
a blob, and there is no file backing it:

+ * @kernel_fw_from_file:
+ *     Load firmware from userspace.
+ *     @file contains the file structure pointing to the file containing
+ *     the firmware to load. If the module is being loaded from a blob,
+ *     this argument will be NULL.
+ *     @buf pointer to buffer containing firmware contents.
+ *     @size length of the firmware contents.
+ *     Return 0 if permission is granted.

An LSM that has a policy to require a file to back the firmware would
reject such loads.

-Kees

-- 
Kees Cook
Chrome OS Security
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/