Re: [PATCH] sched_clock: Avoid corrupting hrtimer tree during suspend

[John Stultz]

On 07/18/2014 04:24 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 07/18/14 15:42, John Stultz wrote:
>> If its a regression (and needs -stable backports) it needs to go in via
>> tip/timers/urgent, and not via the regular merge window.
>>
>> Whats the additional risk -stable wise for canceling the timer during
>> suspend and starting it back up during resume?
>>
> I'd say close to zero given that we'd only be making the timer run a
> little bit later and we have slack in there already. Here's that version.

Ok, thanks. I'll try to do a closer review it and get it queued. Is
there anyone who might be able to validate this and provide a Tested-by: ?

thanks
-john


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/