Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] perf/sdt : Support for SDT markers

From: Hemant Kumar
Date: Mon Jul 21 2014 - 08:24:59 EST



On 07/20/2014 08:46 AM, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
(2014/07/20 2:32), Hemant Kumar wrote:
[SNIP]
First, scan the binaries using :
# perf list sdt --scan
At a glance, maybe we'd better have perf sdt-cache as like as perf buildid-cache
for manage sdt information. what would you think?

I agree with you having perf sdt-cache similar to perf buildid-cache.
But I think if the functionality of perf sdt-cache is only to build the
cache, then we can
go with the perf list sdt --scan. Since, "perf list sdt" is used for
other purposes too, it
should be less confusing for the users to just add another option
(--scan) to create/modify
the cache. What do you suggest?
I think there may be some other cases, for example adding user local build
binary to the cache, or remove/update it locally. :)

And also, in user's mental model of perf-list, it doesn't take an "active"
action, that always does "passive" action. So adding such "active" scan option
will be more confusing.

Ok, I understand now.

But I also think it is OK that if the sdt is never scanned, the perf-list
automatically scans in background (without any option) or suggests user
to run "perf sdt-cache --scan". (it depends on how long time it may take)

To summarize it, I'd like to suggest adding below functions;

perf list sdt : shows all cached SDT events
perf list sdt <file> : shows SDT events in <file>
perf sdt-cache --scan/-s : scans all system binaries/libraries + added files
perf sdt-cache --add/-a <file(s)> : add SDT events in <file> to cache
perf sdt-cache --remove/-r <file(s)>: remove SDT events in <file> from cache

Yeah, I agree with the above mentioned functions.

So, according to this, if perf list sdt <file> can't find the SDT events for that file
in the SDT cache, should it say "use perf sdt-cache --add <file> to add the SDT
events for that file to the cache", or silently, should add that file's SDT events
to SDT cache?

And if perf list can't find sdt-cache, it would suggest to run
perf sdt-cache --scan or run it silently. :)

[...]

--
Thanks,
Hemant Kumar

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/