Re: [PATCH 02/16] rcu: Check return value for cpumask allocation

[Paul E. McKenney]

On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 01:09:39AM -0400, Pranith Kumar wrote:
> This commit add a check for return value of zalloc_cpumask_var() used while
> allocating cpumask for rcu_nocb_mask.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Pranith Kumar <bobby.prani@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h | 5 ++++-
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
> index f07b643..bac9797 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
> +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
> @@ -88,7 +88,10 @@ static void __init rcu_bootup_announce_oddness(void)
>  #ifdef CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU
>  #ifndef CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU_NONE
>  	if (!have_rcu_nocb_mask) {
> -		zalloc_cpumask_var(&rcu_nocb_mask, GFP_KERNEL);
> +		if (!zalloc_cpumask_var(&rcu_nocb_mask, GFP_KERNEL)) {
> +			pr_info("rcu_nocb_mask allocation failed\n");
> +			return;

Good catch, but this "return" is an accident waiting to happen.  The
accident will happen as soon as another RCU option appears, and the
person adding it quite naturally adds it at the end of this function.
The cleanest approach is to make an rcu_bootup_announce_oddness_nocb()
as one commit that does -only- code motion, and the make this change
as another commit.

							Thanx, Paul

> +		}
>  		have_rcu_nocb_mask = true;
>  	}
>  #ifdef CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU_ZERO
> -- 
> 2.0.0.rc2
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/