Re: [PATCH 04/15] Input: atmel_mxt_ts - implement device tree support

From: Nick Dyer
Date: Thu Jul 24 2014 - 11:10:53 EST

On 23/07/14 22:36, Stephen Warren wrote:
> Hmm. It looks like the version of this patch that was actually applied
> varies quite a bit from what was posted, in particular in the
> implementation and call site of mxt_parse_dt(). It'd be nice if the
> commit log had been adjusted to mention this, so it didn't look like *I*
> caused all those compile errors and warnings that the 0-day builder just
> found:-(

Apologies for my part in this. It doesn't help that this patch went through
several revisions. Is there a best practice for when to remove
signed-off-by or change authorship documented anywhere?
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at