Re: [PATCH] staging: Change kzalloc to kcalloc

From: Nick Krause
Date: Thu Jul 24 2014 - 12:50:37 EST

On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 12:47 PM, MÃns RullgÃrd <mans@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Nick Krause <xerofoify@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>> On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 12:34 PM, MÃns RullgÃrd <mans@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> Nick Krause <xerofoify@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>>>> On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 12:15 PM, MÃns RullgÃrd <mans@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>> Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>>>>>> On Thu, 24 Jul 2014 10:47:25 -0400
>>>>>> Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>> The three parameters are the number of elements, the size of each individual
>>>>>>> element, and then finally the flags used on how to allocate that memory.
>>>>>>> I have to say, you did get the flags part correct.
>>>>>>> Now lets look at what you did. For the size you had:
>>>>>> That should have read "For the count you had:"
>>>>>> Oh well, you get my point anyway.
>>>>> I have some doubts about the last bit.
>>>> I am have this discussion with other kernel developers and just
>>>> because I send out one patch as a newbie like this doesn't mean I
>>>> don't known C.
>>> Now I no longer have doubts; I know for certain that the point didn't
>>> get across.
>> I get your point try other things but I talked to other kernel
>> developers and most of them seemed to get this feedback to when they
>> started.
> Most kernel devs most certainly did NOT get started by spamming lkml
> with unnecessary and incorrect patches despite being repeatedly told to
> go away and stop wasting everybody's time.
> --
> MÃns RullgÃrd
> mans@xxxxxxxxx

FIne , I give up. You want me to leave this then I wiil.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at