Hi Varka,
Regarding a point you suggested.
On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 09:54:43AM +0530, Varka Bhadram wrote:
On 07/25/2014 09:33 AM, Nicolin Chen wrote:Hmm.. fsl_asrc_ids is called in probe(), so it's probably not a good choice
(...)
+move these ids after probe/remove... every driver follows same thing...
+static const struct platform_device_id fsl_asrc_devtype[] = {
+ {
+ .name = "imx35-asrc",
+ .driver_data = IMX35_ASRC,
+ }, {
+ .name = "imx53-asrc",
+ .driver_data = IMX53_ASRC,
+ }, {
+ /* sentinel */
+ }
+};
+MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(platform, fsl_asrc_devtype);
+
+static const struct of_device_id fsl_asrc_ids[] = {
+ {
+ .compatible = "fsl,imx35-asrc",
+ .data = &fsl_asrc_devtype[IMX35_ASRC],
+ }, {
+ .compatible = "fsl,imx53-asrc",
+ .data = &fsl_asrc_devtype[IMX53_ASRC],
+ }, {
+ /* sentinel */
+ }
+};
+MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, fsl_asrc_ids);
+
to put them after probe/remove. And actually not every driver does so.
For example drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-s3c2410.c
I think it should be okay to put here if it contains data.